Aristotle & Virtue Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #38
Articles Blog

Aristotle & Virtue Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #38

August 12, 2019


Imagine a person who always knows what to
say. Who can diffuse a tense situation, deliver tough news gracefully, is confident without being arrogant, brave but not reckless, generous but never extravagant. This is the type of person that everybody
wants to be around, and to be like. Someone who seems to have mastered the art
of being a person. This may sound like an impossible feat, but Aristotle believed that, while rare, these people do exist. And they are what we all should aspire to
be: virtuous. And there’s a whole moral theory based on
this idea of virtue. But unlike most of the moral theories we’ve discussed, virtue theory doesn’t spend a lot of time telling you what to do. There’s no categorical imperative or principle
of utility. Instead, virtue theory is all about character. Rather than saying, “follow these rules so that you can be a good person,” Aristotle and other virtue theorists reasoned that, if we can just focus on being good people, the right actions will follow, effortlessly. Become a good person, and you will do good things.
No rulebook needed. So, why should you be a virtuous person? Because: eudaimonia. [Theme Music] Virtue theory reflects the ancient assumption that humans have a fixed nature – an essence – and that the way we flourish is by adhering to that nature. Aristotle described this in terms of what
he called proper functioning. Everything has a function, and a thing is good to the extent that it fulfills its function, and bad to the extent that it doesn’t. This is easy to see in objects created by
humans. A function of a knife is to cut, so a dull
knife is a bad knife. And a function of a flower is to grow and reproduce, so a flower that doesn’t do that is just bad at being a flower. And the same goes for humans – we’re animals – so all the stuff that would indicate proper functioning for an animal holds true for us as well – we need to grow and be healthy and fertile. But we’re also “the rational animal,” and a social animal, so our function also involves using reason and getting along with our pack. Now you might notice that some of this sounds like parts of natural law theory – Aquinas’ theory that God made us with the tools we need to know what’s Good. Well, Aristotle had a strong influence on Thomas Aquinas, so part of Aristotle’s thoughts on virtue ended up in natural law theory. But for Aristotle, this isn’t about God’s
plan, it’s just about nature. Aristotle argued that nature has built into us the desire to be virtuous, in the same way that acorns are built with the drive to become oak trees. But what exactly does it mean to be virtuous? Aristotle said that having virtue just means doing the right thing, at the right time, in the right way, in the right amount, toward the right people. Which sort of sounds like Aristotle is saying
exactly nothing. I mean, how vague can you be? But according to Aristotle, there’s no need to be specific, because if you’re virtuous, you know what to do. All the time. You know how to handle yourself and how to
get along with others. You have good judgment, you can read a room,
and you know what’s right and when. Aristotle understood virtue as a set of robust character traits that, once developed, will lead to predictably good behavior. You can think of virtue as the midpoint between
two extremes, which Aristotle called vices. Virtue is the just-right amount – the sweet spot between the extreme of excess and the extreme of deficiency. And this sweet spot is known as the Golden
Mean. So let’s take a look at some particular
virtues, starting with courage. What is courage? To take a closer look at this, let’s head
to the Thought Bubble for some Flash Philosophy. Walking home from a movie, you see a person
being mugged. What is the courageous action for you to take? Your impulse might be to say that a courageous person would run over there and stop the mugging, because courage means putting yourself in harm’s way for a good cause, right? Well, no. A virtuous person – in the Aristotelian
sense – would first take stock of the situation. If you size up the mugger and have a good reason to believe that you could safely intervene, then that’s probably the courageous choice. But if you assess the situation and recognize that intervention is likely to mean that both you and the victim will be in danger, the courageous choice is not to intervene, but to call for help instead. According to Aristotle, courage is the midpoint
between the extremes of cowardice and recklessness. Cowardice is a deficiency of courage, while recklessness is an excess of courage – and both are bad. Aristotle said that you definitely can have
too much of a good thing. So, being courageous doesn’t mean rushing
headlong into danger. A courageous person will assess the situation, they’ll know their own abilities, and they’ll take action that is right in the particular situation. Part of having courage, he argued, is being able to recognize when, rather than stepping in, you need to find an authority who can handle a situation that’s too big for you to tackle alone. Basically, courage is finding the right way
to act. And a lot of the time – but not all of the time – that means doing a thing that you know you’re capable of, even if doing it scares the pants off of you. Thanks, Thought Bubble! Aristotle thought all virtue works like this. The right action is always a midpoint between
extremes. So, there’s no all-or-nothing in this theory
– even honesty. In this view, honesty is the perfect midpoint between brutal honesty and failing to say things that need to be said. Like, no one needs to be told that they have
a big zit on their face – they already know. The virtue of honesty means knowing what needs to be put out there, and what you should keep quiet about. And it also means knowing how to deliver hard
truths gracefully. How to break bad news gently, or to offer criticism in a way that’s constructive, rather than soul-crushing. The virtue of generosity works the same way. It avoids the obvious vice of stinginess,
but also doesn’t give too much. It’s not generous to give drugs to an addict, or to buy a round of drinks for everyone in the bar when you need that money for rent. The just right amount of generosity means
giving when you have it, to those who need it. It can mean having the disposition to give just for the heck of it, but it also means realizing when you can’t, or shouldn’t give. So now you can see why Aristotle’s definition of virtue was totally vague – where that Golden Mean is depends on the situation. But, if you have to figure out what virtue is in every situation, how can you possibly ever learn to be virtuous? Aristotle thought there was a lot that you could learn from books, but how to be a good person was not one of them. He said virtue is a skill, a way of living, and that’s something that can really only be learned through experience. Virtue is a kind of knowledge that he called
practical wisdom. You might think of it as kind of like street
smarts. And the thing about street smarts is that
you gotta learn ‘em on the street. But the good news is, you don’t have to
do it alone. Aristotle said your character is developed
through habituation. If you do a virtuous thing over and over again,
eventually it will become part of your character. But the way you know what the right thing to do is in the first place, is by finding someone who already knows, and emulating them. These people who already possess virtue are moral exemplars, and according to this theory, we are built with the ability to recognize them, and the desire to emulate them. So you learn virtue by watching it, and then
doing it. In the beginning, it’ll be hard, and maybe it’ll feel fake, because you’re just copying someone who’s better than you at being a good person. But over time, these actions will become an
ingrained part of your character. And eventually, it becomes that robust trait
that Aristotle was talking about. It’ll just manifest every time you need it. That’s when you know you have virtue, fully
realized. It becomes effortless. OK but: Why?
What’s your motivation? What if you have no desire to be the guy who always says the right thing, or the lady who always finds the courage when it’s needed? Virtue theory says that you should become virtuous because, if you are, then you can attain the pinnacle of humanity. It allows you to achieve what’s known as eudaimonia. This is a cool Greek word that doesn’t have
a simple English translation. You might say it means “a life well lived.” It’s sometimes translated as “human flourishing.” And a life of eudaimonia is a life of striving. It’s a life of pushing yourself to your
limits, and finding success. A eudaimonistic life will be full of the happiness that comes from achieving something really difficult, rather than just having it handed to you. But choosing to live a eudaimonistic life means that you’re never done improving, you’re never to a point where you can just coast. You’re constantly setting new goals, and
working to develop new muscles. Choosing to live life in this way also means
you’ll face disappointments, and failures. Eudaimonia doesn’t mean a life of cupcakes
and rainbows. It means the sweet pleasure of sinking into
bed at the end of an absolutely exhausting day. It’s the satisfaction of knowing you’ve accomplished a lot, and that you’ve pushed yourself to be the very best person you could be. This is morality, for Aristotle. It’s being the best you can personally be, honing your strengths while working on your weaknesses. And, for Aristotle, the kind of person who lives like this, is the kind of person who will do good things. Today we learned about virtue theory. We studied the Golden Mean, and how it exists as a midpoint between vices of excess and deficiency. We talked about moral exemplars, and the life
of eudaimonia that comes with virtuousness. Next time, we’re going to consider a tricky
little problem in ethics known as moral luck. Crash Course Philosophy is produced in association
with PBS Digital Studios. You can head over to their channel to check out a playlist of the latest episodes from shows like: PBS Space Time, BBQ with Franklin, and PBS
OffBook. This episode of Crash Course was filmed in
the Doctor Cheryl C. Kinney Crash Course Studio with the help of all of these awesome people and our equally fantastic graphics team is Thought Cafe.

Only registered users can comment.

  1. At the same time as Aristotle, thousands of kilometres away, Confucius writes (pretty much) the same ideas in "Doctrine of the Mean".

  2. The Great Ethics ( Τα Μεγαλα Ηθικα) by Aristotle.A great,great book.Literally food for thought.

  3. This guy missed half of the entire point. "Virtue" is intellectual and character. Intellectual arete is found in the excellence you develop in yourself. And happiness is achieved as you excel – as you do things to do other things (go to college to get a job). Eventually you get to happiness, the state of being, not the doing. Talking fast doesn't equal being correct. Ugh.

  4. I am still confused! What is Aristotle's theory of The Golden Mean? How does reasons play a role in determining a virtue? Can you give examples?

  5. Even after watching this video, I still think that when set off against the other ethical theories and their applications, virtue ethics comes across as vacuous.

  6. I think courage is a combo of recklessness, awareness, empathy, and altruism. A coward is entirely self serving, and a true one knows exactly what real courage is. That's why politicians are close but not the worst. Throwing the word around with no knowledge of its meaning.

  7. I feel like it’s the study of how to stay cool calm and collected in absolutely every situation, and also the study is never ending, but neither are the rewards.

  8. “Eudaimonia” means “Good daemon”. There. A simple English translation. Why would you say there isn’t? You’ll explain Christian concepts but not pagan ones?

  9. I'm pretty sure Eudimonia is pronounced like diamond and Monday, not diaMOANd and MOANday. Eudi*mon*ia.
    Otherwise, good video. I enjoyed it.

  10. Aimee Shigeko Long you can now see this philosophy stuff in a light I can understand. Proper Functioning ie Aristotles reason for living thru experience. The mean say people never change they will always remain the same.

  11. 'For that some should rule and others be ruled is a thing not only necessary, but expedient; from the hour of their birth, some are marked out for subjection, others for rule.'

  12. I find the part about Aristotle and virtue theory is kinda vague and meaningless but knowning about eudaimonia really gives me strength to push myself harder and become … virtuous :D. Thank you Crash Course, should have known and watched your videos more frequently

  13. One thing i have to rectify – Eudaimonia while it is flourishing does not necessarily involve feelings of happiness or satisfaction. In virtue ethics there is a possibility of objectively good life – that is – you can achieve eudaimonia, hearing your friends saying to you that your life is good (and being right according to the virtue ethics) while you yourself are dissatisfied with *insert whatever*. So it is an interesting example of striving for objectifiably good situation over subjective happiness; happiness is implied to follow but is not necessary.

  14. bless your soul, you don’t know how much this helps me in my class. I was so lost but it all is making sense because of you. Thanks man.

  15. 1:55 Functions of Human
    2:27 What is virtuous?
    3:01 Virtue and Mesotes
    3:25 Example of Virtue as Mesotes(middle)
    6:06 Virtue as a Practical Wisdom
    6:16 Habit
    6:33 Moral Exemplars
    7:20 Eudaimonia

  16. This makes no sense because virtue doesn't exist since no one is perfect no action can be truly good. I'm I seeing this wrong or is virtue based on the intention of doing good rather than just doing something that's good? (even the question doesn't make sense that'ts how confused I' am.) help me understand pleassssssse

  17. So…what's goodness. how's good person like. how do you define a good person and is it important to have a someone with a good trait to rule.

  18. I get that it was just an example, but that purse and the thief would be long long gone before the police would get there, so the right thing to do is to direct attention to the mugging by shouting out whats happening and attempt to intervene. While still also having someone call the police

  19. I know virtues of character are necessary for moral virtue but are virtues of thought necessary or sufficient for moral virtue?

  20. Didn't understand my professor at all on this topic, kant or utilitarianism. These videos really helped

  21. I've heard aristotle's virtues stated in different ways in various places. Is there a canon set of however many virtues? what i've read is 'justice, courage, temperance, magnificence, magnanimity, liberality, gentleness, prudence, wisdom'

  22. Do a video on Paulo Paulo freir!
    The misunderstanding of history! (Like a philosophical spin on world history) like "what do you know about history…and how do you know what you know? Well, let's take a look at the otherside of what happend during ww2"

  23. The thing about street smarts is that you got to learn them on the street. ….lol I love his comments on these videos.

  24. I followed a class for this for about 5 months, I didn’t get it
    Then I watched this not even 10 min video and I got it…

  25. It is obvious the show host knows very little about philosophy since he consistently misrepresents Aristotle and fills his shows with logical fallacies. If you really want to learn about Aristotle, find a different video.

  26. So basically, don't take a stand, just sit on the fence. Explains the world we live in now! Damn all this rational thought.

  27. After much thought l have concluded that Eudaimonia is a state only achievable in the memories of others. A conclution reached only after the totality of a single life can be examined. It's totality can not be known until its ending.
    This is reflected in the stories told about one after their death.
    In the meantime, leave good spirit (happiness) in your wake. That way perhaps you'll also leave good memories to share

  28. Does anyone understand how someone adhering to virtue ethics would approach the topic of abortion? So confused…

  29. Aristotle based his idea of "virtue" on many unquestioned assumptions which he believed universal to everyone. I question that notion.

  30. way to fast. Humans breath…. No need to cut out all pauses. Really hard to listen to this. If a person in front of me would talk like that I would leave the room.

  31. Uh—first typo I think I've ever seen in one of these. At :10 (ish), isn't the word you want "defuse" rather than "diffuse" (although I guess "diffuse" is more picturesque). And oh, come on—Eudaimonia? You just made that one up, right?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *